“When you use something for free, you are a product.”
reddit and crying
At the root of the current storm of hype and funding in the AI field are scarce resources. It’s the old-school, human-generated data needed to train huge models like his ChatGPT and DALL-E that generate text and images.
That demand ranges from lawsuits by authors and news organizations who claim their work was used without permission by AI companies to what happens when the internet becomes full of AI-generated content and AI creators are forced to use it. It’s causing all sorts of drama, even down to the pressing issue of.use that To train the AI of the future.
And of course, new business deals are also being facilitated as AI developers rush to lock down repositories of human-generated work that can be used to train AI systems.Look no further than this wild scoop bloomberg: A private AI group has signed a deal to pay Reddit $60 million. per year Because it accesses a huge database of user submissions. Perhaps the surest sign that user data is a key commodity in the AI gold rush.
modification squad
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen AI companies request access to caches of text material. Remember when Axel Springer was the owner of publications such as: politiko to business insiderhave you signed an agreement with OpenAI to use your outlet’s work on ChatGPT?
But in some ways, it differs from that deal. First, journalists are paid for their work even when they may not benefit or actually be harmed by being included in AI systems. But Redditors have contributed a tremendous amount of words as a labor of love, and it’s upsetting when it’s all siphoned off for profit.
“Where’s my point?” quipped a Redditor following the news.
“When you use something for free, you’re a product,” another countered.
What’s even stranger is that we don’t actually know who is paying for all this data, even though a significant amount of money changes hands over $60 million each year.
“As an AI language model, we cannot accept user data from public forums being sold as training data without compensation to the users of those forums,” another Redditor wrote about AI trading, adding that it is not acceptable to sell user data from public forums as training data without compensation to the users of those forums, including ChatGPT and other systems. satirized the way in which he frequently raised objections. He answers controversial questions.
Learn more about AI: Amazon AGI team says its AI is unlocking “new capabilities”
