Davis, M., Faurby, S. & Svenning, J. C. Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(44), 11262–11267 (2018).
Google Scholar
De León, L. F., Silva, B., Avilés-Rodríguez, K. J. & Buitrago-Rosas, D. Harnessing the omics revolution to address the global biodiversity crisis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 80, 102901 (2023).
Google Scholar
Steiner, M., & Huettmann, F. Sustainable Squirrel Conservation: A Modern Re-Assessment of Family Sciuridae. (Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland 2023).
Burgin, C. J. et al. Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World (Lynx Ediciones, 2020).
Thorington Jr, R. W., Koprowski, J. L., Steele, M. A., & Whatton, J. F. Squirrels of the world. (JHU Press 2012).
Koprowski, J. L., & Nandini, R. Global hotspots and knowledge gaps for tree and flying squirrels. Curr. Sci. 851–856 (2008).
Regmi, G. R., & Huettmann, F. (Eds.). Hindu Kush-Himalaya watersheds downhill: Landscape ecology and conservation perspectives. (Springer International Publishing 2020).
Humphries, G., Magness, D.R., & Huettmann, F. Machine Learning for Ecology and Sustainable Natural Resource Management (Springer, Switzerland 2018).
Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S. & Amorim, D. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 3133–3181 (2014).
Google Scholar
Suber, P. Open access (p. 1–256). (The MIT Press, Cambridge 2012).
Sriram, S., & Huettmann, F. A Global model of predicted peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) distribution with open source GIS code and 104 open access layers for use by the global public. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Disc. 1–39 (unpublished).
Boulanger-Lapointe, N. et al. Herbivore species coexistence in changing rangeland ecosystems: First high resolution national open-source and open-access ensemble models for Iceland. Sci. Total Environ. 845, 157140 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hardy, S. M., Lindgren, M., Konakanchi, H., & Huettmann, F. Predicting the distribution and ecological niche of unexploited snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) populations in Alaskan waters: A first open-access ensemble model. 608–622 (2011).
Huettmann, F. Advanced Data Mining (Cloning) of Predicted Climate-Scapes and Their Variances Assessed with Machine Learning: An Example from Southern Alaska Shows Topographical Biases and Strong Differences. Mach. Learn. Ecol. Sustain. Nat. Res. Manag. 227–241 (2018).
Meißner, K. et al. Distribution of benthic marine invertebrates at northern latitudes-An evaluation applying multi-algorithm species distribution models. J. Sea Res. 85, 241–254 (2014).
Google Scholar
Elith, J. et al. Presence-only and presence-absence data for comparing species distribution modeling methods. Biodivers. Inf. 15(2), 69–80 (2020).
Phillips, S. J. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19(1), 181–197 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hart-Davis, G. Creating and Using Excel Database Tables. In Beginning Microsoft Office 2010 (pp. 393–411). (Berkeley, CA: Apress 2010).
Grillo, M., Huettmann, F., Guglielmo, L. & Schiaparelli, S. Three-dimensional quantification of copepods predictive distributions in the Ross Sea: First data based on a machine learning model approach and open access (FAIR) data. Diversity 14(5), 355 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mi, C., Huettmann, F., Guo, Y., Han, X. & Wen, L. Why choose Random Forest to predict rare species distribution with few samples in large undersampled areas? Three Asian crane species models provide supporting evidence. PeerJ 5, e2849 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J., & van Etten, J. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version, 2(8) (2016).
Hijmans, R. J., & Elith, J. Species distribution modeling with R. R Cran Project (2013).
Bivand, R. et al. Package ‘rgeos’. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) (2017).
Pebesma, E., Bivand, R., Pebesma, M. E., RColorBrewer, S., & Collate, A. A. A. Package ‘sp’. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (2012).
Urbanek, S. rJava: Low-level R to Java interface. http://www.rforge.net/rJava/ (2013).
Joseph, V. R. Optimal ratio for data splitting. Stat. Anal. Data Min. ASA Data Sci. J. 15(4), 531–538 (2022).
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Statistical modeling: The two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Stat. Sci. 16(3), 199–231 (2001).
Google Scholar
Krauze-Gryz, D., Gryz, J. & Brach, M. Spatial organization, behaviour and feeding habits of red squirrels: Differences between an urban park and an urban forest. J. Zool. 315(1), 69–78 (2021).
Google Scholar
Luckett, W.P., & Hartenberger, J.L. Evolutionary relationships among rodents: comments and conclusions. In Evolutionary relationships among rodents (pp. 685–712). Springer, Boston, MA (1985).
Nelson, D. D. et al. Francisella tularensis infection without lesions in gray tree squirrels (Sciurus griseus): A diagnostic challenge. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 26(2), 312–315 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pearson, D. E. & Ruggiero, L. F. Test of the prey-base hypothesis to explain use of red squirrel midden sites by American martens. Can. J. Zool. 79(8), 1372–1379 (2001).
Google Scholar
Pineda-Munoz, S., Wang, Y., Lyons, S. K., Tóth, A. B. & McGuire, J. L. Mammal species occupy different climates following the expansion of human impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(2), e1922859118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stein, B. A. States of the union: Ranking America’s biodiversity. (NatureServe 2002).
Cervellini, M. et al. Diversity of European habitat types is correlated with geography more than climate and human pressure. Ecol. Evol. 11(24), 18111–18124 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bookbinder, M. P., & Ledec, G. A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. World Wildlife Fund and World Bank, Washington, DCFAO (2003) FAOs global estimate of mangroves. www.fao.org (1995).
Huettmann, F. (Ed.). Central American biodiversity: conservation, ecology, and a sustainable future (Springer 2015).
Morales-Marroquín, J. A., Solis Miranda, R., Baldin Pinheiro, J. & Zucchi, M. I. Biodiversity research in Central America: A regional comparison in scientific production using bibliometrics and democracy indicators. Front. Res. Metrics Anal. 7, 44 (2022).
Reid, F. A field guide to mammals of North America, north of Mexico (Vol. 4). (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2006).
Aulagnier, S. Atlantoxerus getulus (errata version published in 2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T2358A115518165. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T2358A22251981.en. Accessed on 03 February 2023.
Jacobson, A. P., Riggio, J., M Tait, A., & EM Baillie, J. Global areas of low human impact (‘Low Impact Areas’) and fragmentation of the natural world. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–13 (2019).
Bizhanova, N. et al. The Elusive Turkestan Lynx at the Northwestern edge of geographic range: Current suitable habitats and distribution forecast in the climate change. Sustainability 14(15), 9491 (2022).
Google Scholar
Procheş, Ş., Ramdhani, S., Hughes, A. C., & Koh, L. P. Southeast Asia as one of world’s primary sources of biotic recolonization following anthropocene extinctions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 116.
Sodhi, N. S., & Brook, B. W. Southeast Asian biodiversity in crisis. (Cambridge University Press 2006).
Sodhi, N. S., Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. Tropical conservation biology. (John Wiley & Sons 2013).
Sodhi, N. S. et al. Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 143(10), 2375–2384 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W. & Ng, P. K. Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(12), 654–660 (2004).
Google Scholar
Sodhi, N. S., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P. & Brook, B. W. A meta-analysis of the impact of anthropogenic forest disturbance on Southeast Asia’s biotas. Biotropica 41(1), 103–109 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sodhi, N. S. et al. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 317–328. https://peerj.com/articles/11830/ (2010).
Awodoyin, R. O. et al. Indigenous fruit trees of tropical Africa: Status, opportunity for development and biodiversity management. Agric. Sci. 6(01), 31 (2015).
Couvreur, T. L. et al. Tectonics, climate and the diversification of the tropical African terrestrial flora and fauna. Biol. Rev. 96(1), 16–51 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M., & Gascon, C. Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In Biodiversity hotspots: distribution and protection of conservation priority areas, 3–22 (2011).
Reid, W. V. Biodiversity hotspots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13(7), 275–280 (1998).
Google Scholar
Abreu-Jr, E. F. D. et al. Spatiotemporal diversification of tree squirrels: Is the South American invasion and speciation really that recent and fast?. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 230 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hafner, M. S., Barkley, L. J. & Chupasko, J. M. Evolutionary genetics of New World tree squirrels (tribe Sciurini). J. Mammal. 75(1), 102–109 (1994).
Google Scholar
Pečnerová, P. & Martínková, N. Evolutionary history of tree squirrels (Rodentia, Sciurini) based on multilocus phylogeny reconstruction. Zool. Script. 41(3), 211–219 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hainsworth, F. R. Optimal body temperatures with shuttling: Desert antelope ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 49(1), 107–116 (1995).
Google Scholar
Bacon, C. D. et al. Geographic and taxonomic disparities in species diversity: Dispersal and diversification rates across Wallace’s line. Evolution 67(7), 2058–2071 (2013).
Google Scholar
Van Oosterzee, P. Where worlds collide: the Wallace Line. (Cornell University Press 1997).
White, A. E., Dey, K. K., Stephens, M. & Price, T. D. Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30(3), 685–696 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zurell, D., Fritz, S. A., Rönnfeldt, A., & Steinbauer, M. J. Predicting extinctions with species distribution models. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 1–29 (2023).
Dasari, S., & Kaluri, R. Big data analytics, processing models, taxonomy of tools, V’s, and challenges: State-of-art review and future implications. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. (2023).
Gulyaeva, M., Huettmann, F., Shestopalov, A., Okamatsu, M., Matsuno, K., Chu, D. H., & Bortz, E. Data mining and model-predicting a global disease reservoir for low-pathogenic Avian Influenza (AI) in the wider pacific rim using big data sets. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 16817.
Zabihi, K., Huettmann, F., & Young, B. Predicting multi-species bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) occurrence in Alaska: First use of open access big data mining and open source GIS to provide robust inference and a role model for progress in forest conservation. Biodivers. Inf. 16(1), 1–19.
Huettmann, F. Investigating Matschie’s Tree Kangaroos With ‘Modern’Methods: Digital Workflows, Big Data Project Infrastructure, and Mandated Approaches for a Holistic Conservation Governance. In Tree Kangaroos (pp. 379–391) (Academic Press 2021).
Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2), 129–151 (2006).
Google Scholar
Robold, R. B. & Huettmann, F. High-resolution prediction of American red squirrel in Interior Alaska: A role model for conservation using open access data, machine learning GIS and LIDAR. PeerJ 9, e11830 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Wen, S., Yan, L., Feng, J., & Xia, Y. A hybrid-convolution spatial–temporal recurrent network for traffic flow prediction. Comput. J. bxac171 (2022).
Babu, E. S., Rao, M. S., Swain, G., Nikhath, A. K. & Kaluri, R. Fog-Sec: Secure end-to-end communication in fog-enabled IoT network using permissioned blockchain system. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 33(5), e2248 (2023).
Google Scholar
Komori, O., Eguchi, S., Saigusa, Y., Kusumoto, B. & Kubota, Y. Sampling bias correction in species distribution models by quasi-linear Poisson point process. Ecol. Inf. 55, 101015 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ploton, P. et al. Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 4540 (2020).
Google Scholar
