After the special counsel released a report exonerating the president, House Republicans immediately began pushing anti-Joe Biden talking points.
The Republican special counsel was an appointee of President Donald Trump’s administration. He was given the task of removing even inappropriate appearances.
But after the special counsel characterized Biden as an aloof old idiot who could never be convicted, House Republicans took to social media to say that no one should be in the Oval Office if they can’t control classified documents. I declared that there was no.
Also read: Alina Haba is a persona non grata at a law school in Pennsylvania.
House Republicans criticized him in unison on social media, saying, “A person who is so incompetent to be held accountable for mishandling classified information is certainly not fit for the Oval Office.”
“There is such a thing as irony.” The account by Millard Fillmore said:.
The account, which identifies the person as a “retired nurse,” also notes how many times President Donald Trump used the phrase “I don’t remember” in a statement he gave to Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the Russia probe. It pointed out. At the time, the questionnaire was derided as a “take-home test” because the questions were given to him for his lawyer to complete.
“Hypocrite, your name is Republican.” said the retiree.
“&$#% Are you serious!?!?” Rich Feinberg exclaimed. “Two words: Donald Trump!!!”
Sherry Kersey replied Chairman Mike Johnson (Republican); “If we just replace President Biden with Donald Trump, we might finally be able to have a solid debate. Why would we make such a ridiculous argument when Trump had to physically retrieve the documents?” , shows that you don’t deserve the position and are nothing more than a stooge of Mr. Trump.”
“I’m sorry. Donald Trump wasn’t president when he took those top secret documents. He lost the election, stole the documents on his way home, and then refused to return them when he was caught. It’s true. The question is, what was he planning?” He is a danger to America.” ” Joie Araro responded to conservative Jeanine Pirro:
It wasn’t just House Republicans who drew derision. Special Counsel Robert Hur had a similar response to several glaring errors in the report.
National Security Expert Marcy Wealer elaborated on the report in a thread on social media site X. Among her points is the special counsel’s own confusion about document laws.
“What does the law say if a former vice president wrote something based on a memory recorded as classified on a note card after he left the Naval Observatory? Because Mr. Hur is really picky about timing here. That’s because it’s not in the law.” [the] List,” she said.
President Biden’s lawyer, Bob Bauer, released a statement accusing the special counsel of fabricating the story. Mr. Wheeler identified this as a problem in the “Reflections on the Work” section on page 86. She says Hur’s footnote appears to be a hoax..
